Bishop, stupid question…. is it intended that we read all the listed articles before reading your post? Or are the articles support for your contention and therefore are for further research? Or…?
They are links to earlier episodes of his Christology series. Every new article stands on its own, but the links are there for your ease of navigation, should you wish to go back to others in the series. Of course, they do all have correlations with each other! Hope that helps :)
You mean where is it published? In the volume Kenneth Tanner and Christopher Hall edited— *Ancient & Postmodern Christianity: Paleo-Orthodoxy in the 21st Century*. Fr Kenneth told me today he actually suggested that title and subtitle to Jens.
Bishop, stupid question…. is it intended that we read all the listed articles before reading your post? Or are the articles support for your contention and therefore are for further research? Or…?
They are links to earlier episodes of his Christology series. Every new article stands on its own, but the links are there for your ease of navigation, should you wish to go back to others in the series. Of course, they do all have correlations with each other! Hope that helps :)
Thanks!
Where is the “With No Qualifications?”
You mean where is it published? In the volume Kenneth Tanner and Christopher Hall edited— *Ancient & Postmodern Christianity: Paleo-Orthodoxy in the 21st Century*. Fr Kenneth told me today he actually suggested that title and subtitle to Jens.
This post is my love language.
Torrance is left with (in his own powerful words) “a god behind the back of Jesus,” the very thing his theology sought to avoid.
He avoids it in most cases, but sometimes there's at least a shadow cast.